Monday, June 13, 2005

Jackson trial - not guilty verdict

Quite right too.

I'm suspicious of the compensation-fuelled child abuse industry, and this trial was a classic example of avaricious parents trying to grab some easy dollars.

Michael Jackson may be a bit strange, but I think the evidence in this case was flimsy in the extreme - I hope he can go back to the studio and make another great album.

1 comment:

Merseymike said...

No, it didn't. Because that wasn't what he was being tried for. Mind you, on that logic, lets do away with trials and just lock up people we don't like or approve of, eh?